Would that mean Yang Zing also doesn't require any skill?

idk about yang zing, i rarely meet them in the duel. and i think the maker of this pic is one of the Qli hater. lol

funny joke, but kinda of a lie though :/

cosmic drags are qlis natural ememy

As all the meta, people will claim they're skill-less decks, but I'd wanna see those people playing them the way a pro would.

Not to damage your point but every deck (no matter how easy it is to run) requires a certain level of skill to execute effectively. 

This new meta deck just requires less skill to run properly when compared to other decks (BA, Stellar, Nekov).

while I do think the new meta decks are insanely overpowered, I feel all decks do need skill or you wouldn't be able to win with them. I personally don't use any tier one decks currently, I play yang zings.

Ever since Cyber Dragon released, constant complaints about how the meta takes no skill has arisen. Even Yata Lock didn't have this much salt. Fact is, archetypes are getting more focused as we move forward. Most tournaments are won by archetypes nowadays, not hybrids or rogue decks. Qli are a deck full of behemoths, that's for sure, but it's false to say they take no skill to run. They have distinct weaknesses that every Qli user needs to know to use the deck effectively, and that alone proves the deck DOES take skill to play. I remember when Gravekeepers first got their Recruiter, people were complaining that they take no skill. This was with Royal Tribute at 1, yet with it at 3, there weren't any instances of the deck being meta. It's just a matter of playing what you enjoy, playing it well, and observing trends, until a deck you LOVE becomes meta, then riding that wave to the shore (like I did with Dragon Rulers)

Mr. Logan wrote:

while I do think the new meta decks are insanely overpowered, I feel all decks do need skill or you wouldn't be able to win with them. I personally don't use any tier one decks currently, I play yang zings.

I'm inclined to agree Logan, though "overpowered" might be a bit of a stretch with the new decks as I think it'd be more accurate to say that they're just easier to maintain card advantage while swarming the field better than any deck currently in the game.

Meta nowadays is very OP , that's true. But to say it's unskill, it's false.
Against a tier 2 or lower, yeah, the match is almost done. though

I'd say it's arranged like so in terms of skillz needed : 

Nekroz > BA > shaddolls > Quilhoths > TellarKnights.

sigh, i guessed that you guys cant take the joke. (i wont post meme anymore )
well, all decks need skills to play or you cant play it at all.

LoudFist wrote:

I'd say it's arranged like so in terms of skillz needed : 

Nekroz > BA > shaddolls > Quilhoths > TellarKnights.

so you think tellarknight need the least skill? I think tellarknights are fairly hard to use. I feel the list would be more like this:

Tellarknights > shaddolls > Nekroz > BA > Qliphorts

nekroz, qliphorts, and BA do need a certain amount of skill to run

nekroz because you need to know what you want to do in that turn and you have so many options,
BA because they can special summon so much you need to know when to special summon and when not to
and qlips because you need to realize when to actually use the tributed effects, and you need to know what to search.
 These decks may seem like they run on autopilot but they really dont if anything I find tellars to run on auto because all you need is vega altair, and deneb and you basically have a non-stop lvl 4 xyz party. But that's just my two cents into everything